Can the US Government Seize Your 401k or IRA?

Some links below are from our sponsors. Here’s how we make money.

Advertiser Disclosure: Opinions, reviews, analyses & recommendations are the author’s alone. This article may contain links from our advertisers. For more information, please see our Advertising Policy.

Can the government take your 401k?Will the government scramble your nest egg?
Can the US Government seize your 401k or IRA? It seems far-fetched for a democratic government to unilaterally seize their citizen’s privately held retirement investments, especially in a time of peace. But it wouldn’t be unprecedented. In 2012, the Irish government passed a law which placed a 0.6% levy on assets held in private pensions for…

Can the US Government seize your 401k or IRA? It seems far-fetched for a democratic government to unilaterally seize their citizen’s privately held retirement investments, especially in a time of peace. But it wouldn’t be unprecedented.

In 2012, the Irish government passed a law which placed a 0.6% levy on assets held in private pensions for 4 years. The Irish tax on private pensions was made in response to a larger financial crisis and the need to increase government revenues.

Ireland isn’t the only country in recent history to seize private investments. Hungary, Argentina, and France have all overhauled their private and public pension plans in recent years, in some cases seizing them in their entirety, and in others, taxing them to oblivion.

There have been recent discussions of something similar in the United States, which brings up a good question – are private pensions and retirement plans in the US also at risk?

Is Your 401k or IRA in Danger of Government Seizure?

Can the government take your 401k?
Will the government scramble your nest egg?

Lets get one thing out of the way first: unless you have an IRS levy or other legal judgment against you, the US Government has no legal standing to seize the contents of your private retirement account, such as your 401k, IRA, Thrift Savings Plan, your self-employed retirement plan, or any other retirement plan.

Can the Government Take Your 401k?

Absolutely. But not without changing the laws, and in this case, it would take an act of Congress for the US Government to be able to seize your retirement funds. That means it would need to get through Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court before it would happen.

And getting past the Supreme Court is where I see there being big problems – keep in mind that ownership of private property was one of the founding principles of our country. It is very difficult for the government to seize private property at will.

The government can and does, seize private property, but only in rare cases and through a legal process called eminent domain, which is when land or other property is seized “for the greater good.” However, the government is required to pay fair market value for whatever they seize.**

**This is a simplified explanation of eminent domain, which is a highly complex and much-debated topic. I’m not a lawyer, but I don’t think eminent domain would be a legal basis for seizing retirement accounts. Taxation, however, is a different topic, and the government can easily change tax laws.

What About the Rumors of a Government Takeover?

Every few years there are rumors that a particular administration wants to seize private retirement funds, and so far it hasn’t happened. The rumors come in different flavors and several ideas have even been proposed before Congress. For example, the Clinton Administration proposed a one time tax against the value of private pensions, 401k plans, and IRAs.

A more recent proposal involves seizing and converting a portion of privately held assets into US Treasury bonds. A more extreme proposal is a true government takeover of retirement plans which involves seizing private retirement accounts and converting them to government-sponsored annuities that would guarantee an annual income for all Americans.

What Basis is Given for a Takeover of Retirement Plans?

There are many reasons given to support these ideas, and the most frequently given reasons circle around the idea that converting some or all of the privately held investments into an annuity or into Treasury bonds would protect Americans from themselves and possible market fluctuations and guarantee an income for retirees. In essence, the government believes it can do a better job of managing your retirement funds than you can.

The reality is these proposals would represent a redistribution of wealth and further extend the problem that got the government in trouble in the first place – writing IOUs. Seizing pensions or retirement plans now and replacing them with a Government Treasury bonds or a government-sponsored annuity simply gives the government money to spend now and passes the problem on to a future generation. It also goes against the reason private retirement plans were created.

The Purpose of Retirement Plans

Let’s back up and look at the purpose of 401k plans, IRAs, and other retirement plans. These retirement plans maintain a special tax status and were created for a specific reason: to entice more people to save on their own because Social Security benefits do not pay enough for most retirees.

Social Security is not intended to be a full retirement plan for everyone; it is intended to help people through retirement. Several decades ago Congress was smart enough to realize that people needed to take more of their retirement planning into their own hands, so they created the tax incentives we know today as the 401k plan, IRA, and similar retirement plans.

The special tax rules found in these retirement plans provide an incentive for people to take care of their own retirement planning and not rely on the government for 100% of their retirement needs.

How Retirement Plans Affect the Government

Retirement plans are good. They provide retirees with a source of income and in many cases help keep people off government benefits. For example, Medicaid eligibility is age and income based, starting at age 65.

Social Security benefits are also taxable for retirees who meet a certain income threshold. So retirees receiving enough income from their retirement savings stay off Medicaid and pay taxes on their 401k withdrawals and Social Security benefits, both of which help the government.

While retirement plans help the government, they can also hurt it in other ways. In the case of retirement investing, what is good for investors can be bad of the US government. The tax benefits offered by retirement plans limit or defer the income tax the government collects, to the tune of billions of dollars per year.

For example, Traditional IRAs and 401k plans offer investors an immediate tax break on contributions and the proceeds are taxed when the money is withdrawn in retirement age – often deferring income tax for decades.

Roth IRAs and 401ks are the opposite, with the contributions being made after taxes have been assessed, and the withdrawals and income growth being tax-free.

These tax benefits are the reason there are contribution limits on IRAs and other retirement plans. Without contribution limits, the government would severely limit their income tax receipts.

What Will the Government do with Private Retirement Plans?

Will the US Government seize private retirement plans? The simple answer is, we don’t know. It’s very possible the government could pass a law that seizes every private pension and retirement plan in the US and replaces it with a government annuity to be paid out once retirees reach a certain age.

It’s also possible they will do nothing and leave things as-is. My guess is the government won’t “seize” retirement plans as other governments have. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see retirement plan changes, probably in the form of how they are taxed.

Let’s face it, our government is hurting. There are huge gaps in our fiscal policy and unless we see changes soon, something major will happen.

But seizing private pensions wouldn’t solve that problem, and in fact, it could be seen as a sign of weakness by the global economy and hasten the fall of the US Dollar compared to other currencies. Additionally, seizing private retirement plans would be political suicide for politicians.

What Changes Might We See to Retirement Plans?

We can’t see into the future so all we can do is speculate. But we shouldn’t base our future plans on speculation. I don’t see the government seizing retirement funds from private individuals.

However, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the government make changes to the number and scope of retirement plans. But this would probably be a gradual change and old plans would likely remain grandfathered in.

For example, the US government could decide to decrease retirement plan contribution limits, lower the income eligibility threshold, or eliminate some retirement plans altogether.

But even if they do this, they would likely grandfather in current contributions, meaning your retirement plans in their current state would be safe.

What Can We do to Prepare for Our Retirement?

Right now I don’t think there is anything to be scared about. We can’t control the future, so the best course of action is to continue preparing the best we can based on the information we have at hand.

This means to continue making investments based on current tax laws while being mindful of possible changes. Personally, I am preparing for retirement by investing in my 401k and IRA. I also invest in a taxable (non-retirement) account at an online brokerage.

It is wise to be aware of possible changes to tax laws, but I don’t think it’s wise to let fear and unsubstantiated rumors drive one’s investments and retirement planning. So I will continue investing responsibly, and I will keep an eye on the news.

What do you think? Will the government take over private retirement plans?

Get Instant Access
FREE Weekly Updates! Enter your information to join our mailing list.

About Ryan Guina

Ryan Guina is the founder and editor of Cash Money Life. He is a writer, small business owner, and entrepreneur. He served over 6 years on active duty in the USAF and is a current member of the IL Air National Guard.

Ryan started Cash Money Life in 2007 after separating from active duty military service and has been writing about financial, small business, and military benefits topics since then. He also writes about military money topics and military and veterans benefits at The Military Wallet.

Ryan uses Personal Capital to track and manage his finances. Personal Capital is a free software program that allows him to track his net worth, balance his investment portfolio, track his income and expenses, and much more. You can open a free account here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

    Leave A Comment:

    Comments:

    About the comments on this site:

    These responses are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

  1. JoeSnow says

    I have a question. As I understand it, under federal law real property held as an IRA asset is exempt from civil actions and can only be seized as a result of a criminal prosecution. Can a state or local government exercise eminent domain over a property held as an IRA asset since that would be a civil and not a criminal action? Can it be seized under civil forfeiture laws? Have these issues ever been challenged in any court of jurisdiction in the US?

  2. Mr Patriot says

    It is very difficult for the government to seize private property at will? Really? So asset forfeiture is not a real thing? Even if they lie about your alleged crime? Which they do! Guilty until proven innocent?

  3. Noela says

    In reply to the gentleman who advocated term limits. It’s the worst thing that ever happened to California. It removes the responsibility to the voter. The elected politician spends the first half of his first term learning the ropes and most of his second term looking for his next job leaving very little time for legislation. At least with a career politician some small account of the voters wants needs to be reflected in his work. With term limits it doesn’t matter what the voter wants, he’s going to be out of a job in two terms anyway. He is no longer responsible to the voter.

  4. Amy says

    Maybe I’m a little confused. When I read first part of article it stated that the Government could not take our retirement plans but later said they could by going through courts and Senate. My question is , from the way things are going in our Government now, should people be worried? I am seeing to much Government take over/ controlling. Courts not following even our Constitutional Rights. What makes you think that the Courts wouldn’t side with taking them? Democrats have the Senate and I wouldn’t put it passed them to rule in favor. I’m sorry if I sound like a conspiracy theorists but history is repeating it’s self in front of our eyes and a Dictator ruling America.

  5. Debra Ashabranner says

    Sorry but at this point I don’t trust the government. They are destroying America. They lie they cheat and they steal and I wouldn’t put it past them to seize our retirement. They make their own laws legal or not. Until they understand that they work for me and I don’t work for them I won’t give them anymore than they take fro me now. Also my company is automatically forcing me to have a retirement plan and that to me is very suspicious

Load More Comments

Disclaimer: The content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and is not professional financial advice. References to third party products, rates, and offers may change without notice. Please visit the referenced site for current information. We may receive compensation through affiliate or advertising relationships from products mentioned on this site. However, we do not accept compensation for positive reviews; all reviews on this site represent the opinions of the author. Privacy Policy

Editorial Disclosure: This content is not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of the bank advertiser, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. This site may be compensated through the bank advertiser Affiliate Program.