<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Eight Characteristics of a Great Mutual Fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cashmoneylife.com/top-eight-characteristics-of-a-great-mutual-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/top-eight-characteristics-of-a-great-mutual-fund/</link>
	<description>Money Management, Small Business, Career</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: NtJS</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/top-eight-characteristics-of-a-great-mutual-fund/#comment-13201</link>
		<dc:creator>NtJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=910#comment-13201</guid>
		<description>1 and 2 are the most important for me - maybe why there are listed 1 and 2? - at lest in the screening process.  I like to evaluate past performance to see how they&#039;ve weathered storms in the past - 9/11, dot-com bust.  If they&#039;ve produced returns in the past where many others have failed, then you&#039;ve got my attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 and 2 are the most important for me &#8211; maybe why there are listed 1 and 2? &#8211; at lest in the screening process.  I like to evaluate past performance to see how they&#8217;ve weathered storms in the past &#8211; 9/11, dot-com bust.  If they&#8217;ve produced returns in the past where many others have failed, then you&#8217;ve got my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/top-eight-characteristics-of-a-great-mutual-fund/#comment-12973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=910#comment-12973</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Start-Up:&lt;/strong&gt; Good point on past performance. It may not be indicative of future performance, but you may wish to know how a fund performed anyway. Then use that information in conjunction with information about the fund manager, the fund&#039;s current goals (are they aligned with past goals?), the assets in the fund, current market conditions, etc. There are many factors to consider. But I agree, fees and loads are one of the most important factors to consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Start-Up:</strong> Good point on past performance. It may not be indicative of future performance, but you may wish to know how a fund performed anyway. Then use that information in conjunction with information about the fund manager, the fund&#8217;s current goals (are they aligned with past goals?), the assets in the fund, current market conditions, etc. There are many factors to consider. But I agree, fees and loads are one of the most important factors to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start-Up</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/top-eight-characteristics-of-a-great-mutual-fund/#comment-12933</link>
		<dc:creator>Start-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=910#comment-12933</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with points 2 and 4. Fees and loads only reduce your return.

I think looking at past returns even over the long term is a bad strategy. First of all, fund managers are most likely not going to stick with a fund for the long periods you&#039;re looking at. Also, funds tend to revert to the mean. Previous returns are not as important as fees and loads when determining which mutual funds to invest in. I do think looking at past performance can help when looking strictly at consistency.

I agree with point 7 as well. It is extremely hard to effectively manage funds with assets that are too large and that diminishes returns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with points 2 and 4. Fees and loads only reduce your return.</p>
<p>I think looking at past returns even over the long term is a bad strategy. First of all, fund managers are most likely not going to stick with a fund for the long periods you&#8217;re looking at. Also, funds tend to revert to the mean. Previous returns are not as important as fees and loads when determining which mutual funds to invest in. I do think looking at past performance can help when looking strictly at consistency.</p>
<p>I agree with point 7 as well. It is extremely hard to effectively manage funds with assets that are too large and that diminishes returns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/top-eight-characteristics-of-a-great-mutual-fund/#comment-12899</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=910#comment-12899</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

Thanks again for letting me guest post on Cash Money Life. I hope your readers like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>Thanks again for letting me guest post on Cash Money Life. I hope your readers like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

