<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Congress, Wanna Help Your Country? Cut the Fat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/</link>
	<description>Money Management, Small Business, Career</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhu</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-14054</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=996#comment-14054</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not an economist either but I recently grew interested in how tax money was spend, either locally (i.e city hall) or at the highest level.

My conclusion was, a lot of money seem wasted. It seems that politicians invest in the great picture which could be fine on the long run... but they never stay in power long enough to accomplish the plan and the following gov&#039; doesn&#039;t follow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an economist either but I recently grew interested in how tax money was spend, either locally (i.e city hall) or at the highest level.</p>
<p>My conclusion was, a lot of money seem wasted. It seems that politicians invest in the great picture which could be fine on the long run&#8230; but they never stay in power long enough to accomplish the plan and the following gov&#8217; doesn&#8217;t follow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepali</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-14051</link>
		<dc:creator>deepali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=996#comment-14051</guid>
		<description>I am not convinced that letting the market self-correct is necessarily the right approach. I worry that part of the self-correction would be a business flight overseas.  In theory, I&#039;m not opposed to globalization, but in practice, I also appreciate the need to circle the wagons at certain times... 

I also agree that it is confusing when bills are mixed up and the media mishandles the situation.  I should also point out that all riders are not bad, particularly if one of them happens to fix the AMT.

I also think we can&#039;t have it both ways. We want lower taxes, but we oppose anything that &quot;costs the taxpayer&quot;. Some of those &quot;costs&quot; are lost tax revenue, from lowering taxes or creating tax breaks. 

I think we&#039;re bring distracted from the true problem here - this ridiculous bailout bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not convinced that letting the market self-correct is necessarily the right approach. I worry that part of the self-correction would be a business flight overseas.  In theory, I&#8217;m not opposed to globalization, but in practice, I also appreciate the need to circle the wagons at certain times&#8230; </p>
<p>I also agree that it is confusing when bills are mixed up and the media mishandles the situation.  I should also point out that all riders are not bad, particularly if one of them happens to fix the AMT.</p>
<p>I also think we can&#8217;t have it both ways. We want lower taxes, but we oppose anything that &#8220;costs the taxpayer&#8221;. Some of those &#8220;costs&#8221; are lost tax revenue, from lowering taxes or creating tax breaks. </p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re bring distracted from the true problem here &#8211; this ridiculous bailout bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Debt Plan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-14045</link>
		<dc:creator>No Debt Plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=996#comment-14045</guid>
		<description>There are many things wrong with how our legislation/Congress is setup... too many special interests. Sad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many things wrong with how our legislation/Congress is setup&#8230; too many special interests. Sad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarhead</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-14031</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=996#comment-14031</guid>
		<description>Simplifying the tax bill should be any candidates first priority upon entering the white house.  Second should be to cut the pork.  After that is done the economy will be just fine.  too bad it will never happen.

I know that was all a little off topic but I had to get my point out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simplifying the tax bill should be any candidates first priority upon entering the white house.  Second should be to cut the pork.  After that is done the economy will be just fine.  too bad it will never happen.</p>
<p>I know that was all a little off topic but I had to get my point out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-14033</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=996#comment-14033</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;jarhead: &lt;/strong&gt;not off-topic at all. There are many issues that need addressed in our economy, tax system, political system, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>jarhead: </strong>not off-topic at all. There are many issues that need addressed in our economy, tax system, political system, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-14032</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=996#comment-14032</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kirk: &lt;/strong&gt;I agree; letting the market correct itself would be painful. But it is quite possibly the best way to weed out the inherent weakness in our financial system. 

Congress won&#039;t allow that to happen though because people would lose jobs, some companies would fold, and pension plans and retirement funds would lose a lot of money. Many people would need to put off retirement for several more years. Of course, these things are already happening, but the effects would be magnified, and they don&#039;t want to be held responsible for that. 

Allowing the market to correct naturally would be viewed by the media and many people in the public as &quot;inaction&quot; and public outcry would force the government to act... bringing us right back to where we started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kirk: </strong>I agree; letting the market correct itself would be painful. But it is quite possibly the best way to weed out the inherent weakness in our financial system. </p>
<p>Congress won&#8217;t allow that to happen though because people would lose jobs, some companies would fold, and pension plans and retirement funds would lose a lot of money. Many people would need to put off retirement for several more years. Of course, these things are already happening, but the effects would be magnified, and they don&#8217;t want to be held responsible for that. </p>
<p>Allowing the market to correct naturally would be viewed by the media and many people in the public as &#8220;inaction&#8221; and public outcry would force the government to act&#8230; bringing us right back to where we started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-14029</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=996#comment-14029</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mrs. Micah&lt;/strong&gt;, I couldn&#039;t have said it better. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mrs. Micah</strong>, I couldn&#8217;t have said it better. <img src='http://cashmoneylife.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/economic-bailout-pork-barrel-spending/#comment-14028</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/?p=996#comment-14028</guid>
		<description>I agree with Brian. The bills should be different. Furthermore, the tax law should be simplified to negate the need for the extenders. If we had a lower corporate tax that was consistent, we would attract more capital and business.

Cutting the fat is huge. I was at an event with Senator Ben Cardin (of Maryland) and Knight Kiplinger (founder of Kiplingers personal finance). Knight stood beside Senator Cardin, and he made a fantastic point. Our perilous economic situation is due to a lack of savings. He said it wasn&#039;t only individuals who fail to save, but Capitol Hill and the White House. He stood by the Senator and said these guys need to act like adults and get their house in order. Gutsy comment, but so true.

As far as the bailout, it won&#039;t work. It might help, but it won&#039;t take us out of this mess. In fact, there is a strong case to be made that government intervention in the economy drags out the inefficiencies that recessions get rid of. 

Most think the Great Depression was a fault of capitalism and it was the government that brought us out. No. The government took what would have been a difficult recession and turned it into a depression. The Fed tightened money when it was needed and the Smoot Hawley tariff created a worldwide economic battle that caused economies to shed jobs in large numbers.  Later after FDR took office, he tried price fixing assets and goods, and this made things worse. Of course, a strong case could be made the huge leverage and inefficienies of the thirties may not have come about if not for the Fed. 

If we just let the market correct, this would be painful. We would see 10% unemployment and probably further losses in the markets. However, we would get through this much quicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brian. The bills should be different. Furthermore, the tax law should be simplified to negate the need for the extenders. If we had a lower corporate tax that was consistent, we would attract more capital and business.</p>
<p>Cutting the fat is huge. I was at an event with Senator Ben Cardin (of Maryland) and Knight Kiplinger (founder of Kiplingers personal finance). Knight stood beside Senator Cardin, and he made a fantastic point. Our perilous economic situation is due to a lack of savings. He said it wasn&#8217;t only individuals who fail to save, but Capitol Hill and the White House. He stood by the Senator and said these guys need to act like adults and get their house in order. Gutsy comment, but so true.</p>
<p>As far as the bailout, it won&#8217;t work. It might help, but it won&#8217;t take us out of this mess. In fact, there is a strong case to be made that government intervention in the economy drags out the inefficiencies that recessions get rid of. </p>
<p>Most think the Great Depression was a fault of capitalism and it was the government that brought us out. No. The government took what would have been a difficult recession and turned it into a depression. The Fed tightened money when it was needed and the Smoot Hawley tariff created a worldwide economic battle that caused economies to shed jobs in large numbers.  Later after FDR took office, he tried price fixing assets and goods, and this made things worse. Of course, a strong case could be made the huge leverage and inefficienies of the thirties may not have come about if not for the Fed. </p>
<p>If we just let the market correct, this would be painful. We would see 10% unemployment and probably further losses in the markets. However, we would get through this much quicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

