<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revolution Money Exchange Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/</link>
	<description>Money Management, Small Business, Career</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-16586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/#comment-16586</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, Rev. Thanks for the info. Any idea when the announcement will be made, or has it already been made public?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, Rev. Thanks for the info. Any idea when the announcement will be made, or has it already been made public?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-16583</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/#comment-16583</guid>
		<description>Revolution Money is going under. They have run out of money. The Board of Directors and Executive Management are to blame. The Board tried to drive accounts with a huge marketing spend.  This is typical of AOL where the business model was to drive accounts and not take care of the customer. The online approach mirrored that and the user interface, customer issues and processes were not a priority.

One problem was they didn’t take care of the customer or look for long-term value and the user interface required an overhaul or temporary band-aids. None of which were done. The online interface was actually an AOL-esque application and not a web-based interface. 

Online issues were identified early yet there was no course correction. The senior management and directors did not have experience with an immature online business that needed to take care of the customer. Directors and VPs were hired who had little or no online experience. Early hiring strategy was to hire the executive staff, rather than hire workers. Several VPs was upset that they did not have a secretary to manage their schedule. 

While the business model was solid, the executive management did not have the expertise to run an integrated online and direct marketing campaign. While their response will be - failure was caused by an economic downturn, this is far from the truth. For example, the executives gold-plated the IT operation, installed it and then saw funds were low and fired all the contractors who helped install this. Worse, the Executives purchased the new Mac Air Notebooks when their PC laptops were just fine. Proven web strategies were ignored in favor of driving accounts. Priorities were ever shifting and became a running joke amongst the staff. Also, the call center was moved in-house from an outside location, which may have redirected IT and other resources from existing priorities.

This failure will be a great study for B-Schools. Also, the lessons of the Internet business in the late nineties and 2000 were ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revolution Money is going under. They have run out of money. The Board of Directors and Executive Management are to blame. The Board tried to drive accounts with a huge marketing spend.  This is typical of AOL where the business model was to drive accounts and not take care of the customer. The online approach mirrored that and the user interface, customer issues and processes were not a priority.</p>
<p>One problem was they didn’t take care of the customer or look for long-term value and the user interface required an overhaul or temporary band-aids. None of which were done. The online interface was actually an AOL-esque application and not a web-based interface. </p>
<p>Online issues were identified early yet there was no course correction. The senior management and directors did not have experience with an immature online business that needed to take care of the customer. Directors and VPs were hired who had little or no online experience. Early hiring strategy was to hire the executive staff, rather than hire workers. Several VPs was upset that they did not have a secretary to manage their schedule. </p>
<p>While the business model was solid, the executive management did not have the expertise to run an integrated online and direct marketing campaign. While their response will be &#8211; failure was caused by an economic downturn, this is far from the truth. For example, the executives gold-plated the IT operation, installed it and then saw funds were low and fired all the contractors who helped install this. Worse, the Executives purchased the new Mac Air Notebooks when their PC laptops were just fine. Proven web strategies were ignored in favor of driving accounts. Priorities were ever shifting and became a running joke amongst the staff. Also, the call center was moved in-house from an outside location, which may have redirected IT and other resources from existing priorities.</p>
<p>This failure will be a great study for B-Schools. Also, the lessons of the Internet business in the late nineties and 2000 were ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-16344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/#comment-16344</guid>
		<description>I guess each startup faces difficulties. The concept is a good one, but with interest rates as low as they are, I wouldn&#039;t bu surprised if they have to change their business structure, much like &lt;a href=&quot;http://cashmoneylife.com/2009/01/30/zecco-changes-requirements-for-free-trades/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zecco recently did be restricting the number of free stock trades&lt;/a&gt;.

I never keep much money in my RevMoney account, or any similar account like PayPal. I prefer to keep my money where it will earn better interest for me and isn&#039;t at the mercy of a new company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess each startup faces difficulties. The concept is a good one, but with interest rates as low as they are, I wouldn&#8217;t bu surprised if they have to change their business structure, much like <a href="http://cashmoneylife.com/2009/01/30/zecco-changes-requirements-for-free-trades/" rel="nofollow">Zecco recently did be restricting the number of free stock trades</a>.</p>
<p>I never keep much money in my RevMoney account, or any similar account like PayPal. I prefer to keep my money where it will earn better interest for me and isn&#8217;t at the mercy of a new company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-16343</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/#comment-16343</guid>
		<description>Revolution Money cant seem to get it right. They just sent out an email to its customer base, &quot;Subject: Generated Monthly Statement&quot; and the last name was wrong. Not even close. They used a bunch of constants.

They have had three layoffs since September and no one knows if they are getting any more funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revolution Money cant seem to get it right. They just sent out an email to its customer base, &#8220;Subject: Generated Monthly Statement&#8221; and the last name was wrong. Not even close. They used a bunch of constants.</p>
<p>They have had three layoffs since September and no one knows if they are getting any more funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-9168</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/#comment-9168</guid>
		<description>Inhouston,

I wasn&#039;t aware that RME didn&#039;t have any consumer protection. I have used RME with no problems, but I have only used it for a few minor transactions. I&#039;m sorry to hear you had this issue with them. At the minimum, RME should open an investigation, and I hope they do that. To open an account, one must register their SSN, so hopefully RME will be able to track the person down. If not, you may be able to track them down if the &quot;buyer&quot; wasn&#039;t careful. I hope you get the jerk who did this. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inhouston,</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware that RME didn&#8217;t have any consumer protection. I have used RME with no problems, but I have only used it for a few minor transactions. I&#8217;m sorry to hear you had this issue with them. At the minimum, RME should open an investigation, and I hope they do that. To open an account, one must register their SSN, so hopefully RME will be able to track the person down. If not, you may be able to track them down if the &#8220;buyer&#8221; wasn&#8217;t careful. I hope you get the jerk who did this. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lnhouston</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-9148</link>
		<dc:creator>lnhouston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/#comment-9148</guid>
		<description>I used RME to accept payment for a laptop valued at $1150. I sold it for $700 plus express shipping of $55. I went to withdraw my $755 directly to my bank account and was denied and account locked. Seems that the sender had NSF and the payment from the sender&#039;s bank was returned and I&#039;m out my $755 and a laptop. There is no seller or buyer protection with RME. I have to go after the person that I sold the laptop to. Even though a person has to add funds from their bank account and have them clear before payment can be sent the funds can come back as NSF because they don&#039;t directly clear from their bank account (does that make sense?) So I&#039;m screwed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used RME to accept payment for a laptop valued at $1150. I sold it for $700 plus express shipping of $55. I went to withdraw my $755 directly to my bank account and was denied and account locked. Seems that the sender had NSF and the payment from the sender&#8217;s bank was returned and I&#8217;m out my $755 and a laptop. There is no seller or buyer protection with RME. I have to go after the person that I sold the laptop to. Even though a person has to add funds from their bank account and have them clear before payment can be sent the funds can come back as NSF because they don&#8217;t directly clear from their bank account (does that make sense?) So I&#8217;m screwed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-9038</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/#comment-9038</guid>
		<description>Okay, so I signed up on the 22nd of May to xfer some money from my checking acct. The money was taken from my account but the RME still has this pending. This may be a free service but I could have sent a check in the mail and the transaction would hve been done by now.
So I will be done with RME after this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I signed up on the 22nd of May to xfer some money from my checking acct. The money was taken from my account but the RME still has this pending. This may be a free service but I could have sent a check in the mail and the transaction would hve been done by now.<br />
So I will be done with RME after this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upset at RME</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-8990</link>
		<dc:creator>Upset at RME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2008/04/07/revolution-money-exchange-25-referral-bonus/#comment-8990</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

I just thought I&#039;d update you on my RME issue. My bank refunded all of the fraudulent charges, so I&#039;m ok there. I contacted RME and they didn&#039;t really explain much. They just said they they saw the issue and it was resolved (they didn&#039;t offer to refund my money or anything). I then got an email telling me that my account had been suspended due to suspicious activity. I think it&#039;s disconcerting that they confirmed that there WAS suspicious activity on my account. I guess that was better than denying it, but I would still be wary. That said, it IS possible that the link could have been redirected, and that it wasn&#039;t an error on their part. They were pretty vague in their message. Thanks for your concern, though! I would pass it on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>I just thought I&#8217;d update you on my RME issue. My bank refunded all of the fraudulent charges, so I&#8217;m ok there. I contacted RME and they didn&#8217;t really explain much. They just said they they saw the issue and it was resolved (they didn&#8217;t offer to refund my money or anything). I then got an email telling me that my account had been suspended due to suspicious activity. I think it&#8217;s disconcerting that they confirmed that there WAS suspicious activity on my account. I guess that was better than denying it, but I would still be wary. That said, it IS possible that the link could have been redirected, and that it wasn&#8217;t an error on their part. They were pretty vague in their message. Thanks for your concern, though! I would pass it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
