<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100 Minds That Made the Market: Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/11/26/100-minds-that-made-the-market-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/11/26/100-minds-that-made-the-market-book-review/</link>
	<description>Money Management, Small Business, Career</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:44:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/11/26/100-minds-that-made-the-market-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2742</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/11/26/100-minds-that-made-the-market-book-review/#comment-2742</guid>
		<description>Investing is all about leverage isn&#039;t it? :)

To be honest, I do not know much about Fisher&#039;s fund, so I can&#039;t readily endorse it. But I can endorse the book as being interesting, and well written. 

You do bring up some valid points about marketing, which can make the difference between a successful product and one that fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investing is all about leverage isn&#8217;t it? <img src='http://cashmoneylife.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>To be honest, I do not know much about Fisher&#8217;s fund, so I can&#8217;t readily endorse it. But I can endorse the book as being interesting, and well written. </p>
<p>You do bring up some valid points about marketing, which can make the difference between a successful product and one that fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swim Upstream to Wealth</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/11/26/100-minds-that-made-the-market-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2733</link>
		<dc:creator>Swim Upstream to Wealth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/11/26/100-minds-that-made-the-market-book-review/#comment-2733</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t speak to the book, but I have my doubts about Ken Fisher. I think he did a great job of leveraging his name since his Dad, Philip Fisher, wrote one of the classic investment books, &quot;Commons Stocks, Uncommon Profits.&quot; 

Fisher&#039;s organization does a great job of marketing, but if you look at his spiel, he markets that he knows something that other investors don&#039;t - meaning some inside, proprietary information. This is difficult to do in an efficient market. 

This may be a great book, but don&#039;t assume just because he manages $40Billion that he knows more about investing. He might know more about marketing. Remember, the best product doesn&#039;t always win. Look at AOL. Shoddy product relative to the competition, but great marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak to the book, but I have my doubts about Ken Fisher. I think he did a great job of leveraging his name since his Dad, Philip Fisher, wrote one of the classic investment books, &#8220;Commons Stocks, Uncommon Profits.&#8221; </p>
<p>Fisher&#8217;s organization does a great job of marketing, but if you look at his spiel, he markets that he knows something that other investors don&#8217;t &#8211; meaning some inside, proprietary information. This is difficult to do in an efficient market. </p>
<p>This may be a great book, but don&#8217;t assume just because he manages $40Billion that he knows more about investing. He might know more about marketing. Remember, the best product doesn&#8217;t always win. Look at AOL. Shoddy product relative to the competition, but great marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
