<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Baby Bonds Are a Bad Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/10/04/hillary-clintons-baby-bonds-are-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/10/04/hillary-clintons-baby-bonds-are-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Money Management, Small Business, Career</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:53:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/10/04/hillary-clintons-baby-bonds-are-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/10/04/hillary-clintons-baby-bonds-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>At over 9 trillion dollars, I&#039;m not sure our debt will ever be paid off. To be honest, I&#039;m not sure what to think about it.

I do know I don&#039;t agree with the idea of the  Baby Bonds though. It just doesn&#039;t seem like the benefit outweighs the costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At over 9 trillion dollars, I&#8217;m not sure our debt will ever be paid off. To be honest, I&#8217;m not sure what to think about it.</p>
<p>I do know I don&#8217;t agree with the idea of the  Baby Bonds though. It just doesn&#8217;t seem like the benefit outweighs the costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGuire</title>
		<link>http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/10/04/hillary-clintons-baby-bonds-are-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1666</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cashmoneylife.com/2007/10/04/hillary-clintons-baby-bonds-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>I am always amused by the politicians and their comments.

There is always a good idea if in bad taste.  However bad taste it may be, I always enjoy thinking about it. You say $20 billion dollars annually.

Now what if we actually paid down our national debt?  After all, as citizens of America, you and I do owe a piece of this debt.

If we paid down 1 trillion dollars, I suppose that would pay for 50 years worth of baby bonds, right?

That got me thinking, what if we did that, paid down 1 trillion dollars, and paid down another 1 trillion dollars to fund free tuiton American citizens attending public university?  Well, 1 trillion is a little short, maybe 2 trillion? That could fund 20 years until we pay off the remaining debt.

After all, we bought enough military supplies to last us into the next decade, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always amused by the politicians and their comments.</p>
<p>There is always a good idea if in bad taste.  However bad taste it may be, I always enjoy thinking about it. You say $20 billion dollars annually.</p>
<p>Now what if we actually paid down our national debt?  After all, as citizens of America, you and I do owe a piece of this debt.</p>
<p>If we paid down 1 trillion dollars, I suppose that would pay for 50 years worth of baby bonds, right?</p>
<p>That got me thinking, what if we did that, paid down 1 trillion dollars, and paid down another 1 trillion dollars to fund free tuiton American citizens attending public university?  Well, 1 trillion is a little short, maybe 2 trillion? That could fund 20 years until we pay off the remaining debt.</p>
<p>After all, we bought enough military supplies to last us into the next decade, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
