RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

iPhone Owner Sues for $1 Million

An iPhone owner recently sued Apple Inc. for $1 million, claiming that the recent price cut violated price discrimination laws. Apple reduced the price of the Apple iPhone by almost 1/3 when it reduced the price of the 8 GB iPhone from $599 to $399 two months after the phone debuted.

On Apple’s part, they refunded the price difference for those who had purchased the phone within the previous 14 days, and offered $100 Apple Store vouchers to everyone else who had purchased the iPhone.

Still that was no enough for Dongmei Li of Queens, New York.

According to the lawsuit, “the price reduction injured early purchasers like herself because they cannot resell the product for the same profit as those who bought the cell phone following the price cut.”

Wow! Only in America can you sue a company because you can’t make a profit on an item you purchased from them. Based on her lawsuit, every cell phone manufacturer or company that produces any electronic goods should immediately change the way their products are priced.

I don’t think so. I think this lawsuit should be thrown out before it ever reaches trial.

Slashing the prices of electronics soon after they are released is the most common business practice in the electronics industry. How many people have spent thousands of dollars on a computer or entertainment system that could be bought for a fraction of the cost today? What about the first people who bought DVD players, only to see the price of the same model drop by 75% in the first year? The same goes for DVD burners, external hard drives, and just about every other mainstream electronics item. Prices start high, then as newer technology or more competition comes out, prices are reduced. It has been this way for many years, and the iPhone is no different.

Cell phone companies offer $200+ phones for free when you sign a new cell phone contract. Every cell phone provider offers steep discounts for signing a new contract, extending a contract, adding a line, or for being a loyal customer for a couple years. It’s part of the business model.

Computers and electronics are constantly improving and the older models get discounted as the newer products arrive. In fact, when Apple Inc. cut the price of the iPhone, they also stopped production on the 4 GB iPhone model. I would bet that a newer model is already in work, and no one will want the old 4 GB version.

The woman suing Apple Inc. bought the 4 GB iPhone, which will no longer be produced or sold. I guess she is pretty upset that if she had waited a couple months, she could have bought a better phone for less that she paid for her phone. But, as mentioned earlier, this is the same pricing model most new electronics go through. I guess she has not bought many electronic items before, or she is just looking for some attention.

I think this lawsuit is ridiculous.

Source: CNN

Print This Post Print This Post | | Submit to PFBuzz.com PF Buzz It!

~/~

Do you like what you're reading? Then please consider leaving a comment below, subscribing to my feed, or visiting my Greatest Hits page for more!
Related Posts

Trackback URL

  1. 11 Comment(s)

  2. By Thrifty Penny on Oct 3, 2007 | Reply

    I hope that she learns a valuable lesson: patience is virtue. I think she’s looking to make a quick buck or as you mentioned, attention. Oh well. Everyone seems to be sue happy.

  3. By Stupid Sue on Oct 3, 2007 | Reply

    I can’t believe people now and days. I mean come on $200 doesn’t equal $1 million and damages for what come on!! I purchase a crap load of computer equipment and the very next couple days the prices are dropped I’m not suing them! I 100% agree with everything you said, this lawsuit is stupid and should be thrown out. In Fact, I think Im going to dig up everything I have purchased in the past two months and if it has a lower price Im going after that company for damages it caused me. WHAT BULL CRAP

  4. By American Joe on Oct 3, 2007 | Reply

    I strongly disagree with the other comments here. This woman should be applauded for suing Apple for lowering the price on the iPhone.

    She was clearly duped by Apple’s hip marketing campaign, which touted iPhones as “investment grade” assets that were guaranteed to increase in value.

  5. By Carl on Oct 3, 2007 | Reply

    Wow Joe. It’s corporate America, and things like this happen all the time.

    As a consumer, it was painfully obvious that Apple would lower their prices, because a new model is coming out in only a few months from now.

    If she bought into the hype, that’s her fault. Besides, she gets HALF of that $200 back because Apple decided they wronged too many people.

    So she is suing for $1,000,000 for $100… I hope the judge laughs in her face… what a dumb lawsuit

  6. By Josh on Oct 3, 2007 | Reply

    I hope as well that the judge laughs in her face. When I buy a new computer I dont get to sue anyone because its lost its value in a period of 2 months.

  7. By Traciatim on Oct 3, 2007 | Reply

    I think I should sue her for a million in damages + a slap in the face from any person with an IQ above 100 who would like to. I’ll sue for causing me anger for her stupidity.

  8. By Patrick on Oct 4, 2007 | Reply

    American Joe, you have the contrarian point of view here, and I respect that. I love to play “devil’s advocate” and poke holes into arguments. But this time, I can’t really find one to poke.

    She was clearly duped by Apple’s hip marketing campaign, which touted iPhones as “investment grade” assets that were guaranteed to increase in value.

    I did not see this particular advertisement, but as a general rule, electronics do not increase in value in the long term. With the exception of over-hyped or limited run items, I can’t think of any mainstream electronics product that has increased in value shortly after going on sale.

    Yes, the PS3, X-Box 360 and other gaming systems were easily resold for profits in the first days, just like the iPhone, but after the initial frenzy, the prices have dropped considerably. They key is having patience.

    People should realize from past examples that after the hype wears off and availability increases, the ability to resell for a profit greatly diminishes, or vanishes altogether.

    I can’t seem to justify the argument in her lawsuit that she should be able to resell her phone for the same price as someone else. Nowhere is it required for a company to price something so that individuals can resell it for a profit. That would be detrimental to the company producing the product.

    I can’t find a reason to applaud her. Apple Inc. offered refunds to those who purchased their iPhone within the 14 day window, and offered everyone else a $100 Apple Store voucher. I think Apple did enough on their end. She is just being greedy and looking for attention.

    Still, I thank you for your comment. :)

  9. By Stupid Sue on Oct 4, 2007 | Reply

    I too agree with Patrick again, we do thank you for your comment. But, applaud her? NO WAY…When I bought my xbox 360 and ps3 I knew the prices would drop within a month but because I wanted it so bad I wanted it that month it came out. I think she realized that paying 600 for a cell phone is a ridiculous idea anyways and is probably trying to find a way to pay off her credit card she bought the phone with. And in the technology field NOTHING is an investment trust me I work in the IT field. If you buy something today, it is already old tomorrow and something bigger and better is coming out. Phones are no way an investment.

  10. By Mark on Oct 4, 2007 | Reply

    what a rubbish thinking, you can never even dream that a electronic product will be sold out more then its purchased price.

  11. By Money Blue Book on Oct 4, 2007 | Reply

    It would be like be suing the makers of Axe Body Spray because after using it girls and women aren’t jumping all over me en masse like they do in the commercial.

  12. By Patrick on Oct 4, 2007 | Reply

    Money Blue Book,

    You mean that doesn’t happen to you? ;)

Post a Comment

Comment Policy